![]() ![]() ![]() Such a hype on multiple aspects of business processes shows that the time is now ripe to focus on an investigation of multi-perspective process constructs and relations also at the conceptual level. The increased attention towards other dimensions than the behavioural one, has recently brought to a rapid growth of approaches and tools in the stream of multi-perspective business process modeling and mining , where other perspectives such as resources, data, time, and so on are exploited to augment the basic control-flow one. Modern textual definitions of business processes such as go beyond the classical control-flow dimensions, by taking into account also other important perspectives related to organisational, data, and goal-oriented aspects. ![]() An ontological analysis is finally carried out and possible solutions to the discovered issues are proposed. ![]() The analysis reveals, besides the lack of attention to some crucial business process elements, issues and inconsistencies in the literature meta-models. The obtained literature-based business process meta-model, which is on purpose built to disclose criticalities, is then inspected and discussed. We then combine these elements and relations to build a business process meta-model. In this paper, we start from elements and relations discovered inspecting the literature on business process meta-models through a systematic literature review. Nonetheless, several different business process meta-models have been recently proposed and discussed in the literature, which look at business process models from different perspectives, focusing on different aspects and often using different labels for denoting the same element or element relation. While modern definitions of business processes exist and are shared in the Business Process Management community, a commonly agreed meta-model is still missing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |